Talk:Hiroshi Inoue (bryologist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Death date[edit]

This article says he died in 1989. But what about stuff like this? Maybe the father was a botanist, and the son is an entomologist.Anythingyouwant (talk) 02:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hiroshi InoueHiroshi Inoue (bryologist) – I think that between Hiroshi Inoue the bryologist and Hiroshi Inoue (entomologist) there is no primary topic, so the page Hiroshi Inoue should instead become a disambiguation page. There seem to be 6 incoming article-space Wikilinks for the bryologist and around 190 Wikilinks for the entomologist at present. Both articles have low traffic, averaging less than 5 pageviews per day: [1]. species:Hiroshi Inoue (bryo.) and species:Hiroshi Inoue (ent.) also have comparable view counts within Wikispecies (around 5 for the past thirty days). Googling for "Hiroshi Inoue" brings up assorted people with that name as opposed to primarily results from/by one of these two biologists. The disambiguator (bryologist) appears in articles like Robert Braithwaite (bryologist), Karl Müller (bryologist), and Hiroshi Inoue (bryologist) already exists as a redirect, but we could also move this article to Hiroshi Inoue (botanist). Wikispecies has an entry for a third Hiroshi Inoue, the phycologist species:Hiroshi Inoue (phyc.) which might be a factor, but he doesn't seem to be notable for Wikipedia. Umimmak (talk) 03:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The entomologist seems at least as important. I'm unsure as to the best qualifier; (botanist) is normal but (bryologist) has existing links and distinguishes from the phycologist. Not a WP:ONEOTHER because there's no primary topic. Certes (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.