Talk:Historical society

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Historical society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More diversity[edit]

The article needs work. Currently it appears to mainly represent East coast historical societies in the United States (I did swap out the main image of the Rhode Island Historical Society with the Washington State Historical Society - so that helps). The article needs not only more of a world view but also needs to go beyond place based historical societies and include information on others such as Ethnographic, Topical, and Biographical historical societies. Myotus (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuild of article[edit]

The previous article was focused on details of US east coast historical organizations and did not offer a comprehensive view of the subject. Article definitely still can use more work but good for now. Myotus (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]