Talk:History of Fox News

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Graph[edit]

How about a graph depicting Fox News' ratings since inception? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.236.191.219 (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bias[edit]

as much truth as there is behind Fox's conservative bias, the last paragraph about Bush's first term sounds like something from a liberal extremist blog, not a balanced encyclopedia article. --Kitty 20:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Fox News. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Fox News. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant Propaganda[edit]

The below paragraph is blatant propaganda. Also, much of the section is addressing events outside of the stated years of 2001 to 2004.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Fox_News#Through_first_term_of_George_W._Bush_(2001%E2%80%932004)

"However, in the 2016+ era of television broadcasting, Fox News is evermore on the sidelines. Due to racist comments by the Fox News executives, and reporters blatant stupidity and false-superiority, Fox News has seen dropping ratings. As of 2018, their newest stunt was buddying up with the president, however, this has only caused a mis-information loop where Fox News will say something outrageous (as it must do to create headlines and gain viewers) and Donald Trump will repeat it. Then Mr. Trump will point to Fox News to prove himself right while Fox News points to Donald Trump. Thusly, most of what Donald Trump and Fox News claim to be true is actually fake news."

RGlenB (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Sections[edit]

How come the article has so much content missing? FNC's history from 05 to the present seems to have been stripped away. Did somebody vandalize this page? AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 18:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's just kind of a stub article. Someone added those sections in 2017 when the events happened because they were clearly important in the history of the channel, and nobody has filled them in yet. —BlackTerror (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is so out of date that it references the O'reilly show without including the events that led to his cancellation. Playerpage (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lost millions of dollars every year for years trying to get started[edit]

"Brit Hume noted, in a 1999 interview with PBS: “This operation loses money. It doesn’t lose nearly as much as it did at first, and it’s — well, it’s hit all its projections in terms of, you know, turning a profit, but it’s — it will lose money now, and we expect for a couple more years. I think it’s losing about $80 million to $90 million a year.”"

https://www.salon.com/2018/06/26/tom-steyer-you-want-trump-out-buy-clear-channel_partner/ Fxm87 (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Fox_News&oldid=1207493191"