Talk:History of Oregon wine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thoughts on assessment[edit]

I'd like to get some extra opinions on the current B assessment of this article. Overall, it is in good shape (with the exception of a tiny lead that could use some bulking). A couple things that seem missing is the development of wine production outside of Pinot noir. While Oregon Pinot is certainly special, there has to be some historical detail about Oregon Pinot gris, Pinot blanc or Chardonnay. The articles touches a little on the subject, but I wonder if more details could be said on the impact of the wine industry on the Oregon economy & culture. AgneCheese/Wine 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Oregon wine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]