Talk:History of anthropology by country
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
Peer review:[edit]
- Very well organized. Subtopics show you intend to keep balance.
- Doesn’t include very many latin american countries: how did you determine which countries to provide information on?
- ‘Latin American Anthropology Introduction’ says that it will only include important points in anthropological history from Brazil and Mexico. Is there a reason for this or simply a typo?
- Chosen sources, thus far, are recent - great.
- Current status of discipline and future predictions may be a bit over reaching. I certainly agree that the current status (as of the most recent data available) is good information to include but future predictions are unnecessary because they aren’t necessarily factual.
Page merge[edit]
Hi! I think that we may want to look at either merging this into History_of_anthropology#National_Anthropological_Traditions or vice-versa, depending on what people feel like, since this is discussed in two different areas. Also, something to be careful about is to avoid taking on an essay/OR tone with the articles - I'm going to go through and edit a few places here and there. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Given its length I think this could be split into separate articles for each country, each summarised in a section in history of anthropology. – Joe (talk) 08:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)