Talk:History of graphic design

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:CBSeye.svg[edit]

The image File:CBSeye.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done!--Artaxerex (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering of information?[edit]

So I really like this article. There is a wealth of good information that is well illustrated. Bravo to whomever did this!

I do have one minor quibble though, in my reading, it seemed a bit awkward for an article entitled "History of Graphic Design" to be jumping around chronologically. This articles seems to be arranged in more of a topical order, instead of a chronological order. The jump from "Pioneers of modern graphics and industrial design" to "Ancient Reliefs" was particularly jarring.

Maybe all the article needs is some indenting of the galleries to better re-inforce to the reader that there are topical boundaries that should be mentally heeded? I'm really unsure what kind of editing would work best with this article... or I would do it. Anyways, that's my 2¢. Azoreg (talk) 15:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is a great start! On the point of this discussion, while history can be "read" a lot of different ways, and I support the idea at work in the article (the different threads or themes in GD history), we should assume that this article will be read by people unfamiliar with the various movements. There is no way that the average reader will be able to make sense out of the various movements, or understand a historical thread as the article is currently constructed. UnkleFester (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:: Thank you very much for your comments. Unfortunately writing this article was almost a nightmare. I wrote a first draft of the article in fa.wiki, and then expanded it here. My idea was that the history of graphic design should only be represented with graphic and a minimum use of words. An idea that was immediately was confronted by a strong opposition by some admins. Unfortunately, because of the real and/or perceived copyright issues various segments were constantly deleted. You can check my user page and see how many warnings I received for this article. Sometimes some over zealot young editors objected to a whole section and deleted it completely, and so on and so forth. Finally, I became totally exhausted and abandoned its completion. Even now I see a label that says the article is heavy in use of copyrighted materials which is usually a harbinger of more sections to be considered for deletion. --Artaxerex (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no chronological ordering of information here; it's simply not a history. It's a survey of various graphic design styles and techniques across history and cultures, but for it to be a history of graphic design it needs to have the actual history part. Mpaniello (talk) 00:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do we get it that a poster for a rock concert with Jefferson Airplane, Muddy Waters, Butterfield Blues Band, et al. is dated 1937?[edit]

Okay, now everybody pummel me to death with rebukes for not citing any sources that say that rock music, the Jefferson Airplane, Muddy Waters, and the Butterfield Blues Band didn't exist in 1937. Everybody knows they DID exist in 1937 -- because everybody reads Wikipedia. I thought at first that maybe "1937" meant something other than a year, but no, the poster is in a row with art of the 1930s.64.131.188.67 (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Christopher L. Simpson[reply]

Good catch! -Andrew c [talk] 20:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chauvethorses.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Chauvethorses.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Chauvethorses.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of graphic design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no chronological structure to this article? It's not how histories are written. It jumps from Mondrian to African art to heraldry. All of them fascinating topics to be sure, but a history of graphic design this ain't. Mpaniello (talk) 00:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_graphic_design&oldid=1195078772"