Talk:History of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not real[edit]

What is this? obviously not the 'real' page about MIT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfensberger (talkcontribs) 20:23, 20 November 2006‎

Correct, the link for the MIT article is in the lead (top of page). This specific article is named "History of MIT," not "MIT." For the latter, visit MIT. Zepppep (talk) 02:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage[edit]

Although informative in places, this article needs a lot of work, a very sad state of affairs as MIT celebrates its 150th anniversary. Coverage is very spotty, with long stretches of history skipped over or given cursory coverage. More and possibly better material may be moved here if other articles about MIT are trimmed in length or reorganized. Help is needed to share the work. Reify-tech (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article still has some large gaps in coverage. For example, the early Rogers presidency and the selection of Runkle as a successor are completely omitted. There is a new MIT Press book by Stratton and Mannix that I will try to add to the reference list. Reify-tech (talk) 21:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also known as Boston Institute of Technology?[edit]

Was MIT ever called this? Zepppep (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. Reify-tech (talk) 21:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1916-1940 coverage is sketchy[edit]

Coverage of these years seems notably absent, spanning from the move to Cambridge to the advent of World War 2. Was it removed by vandalism, or was it never written? Reify-tech (talk) 00:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite still needed[edit]

After working on the GA-rated article on Francis Amasa Walker, I noticed that 7 paragraphs of that article were simply cut-and-pasted to form the majority of the "Boston Tech" section of this article. This content forking is a very bad idea, as illustrated by the fact that updates and cleanups of the original article are not propagated to this article. I am not inclined to do repeated tandem edits to both articles; it would be better to just summarize the Walker article, or to include it by reference. There may be other instances of content forking in this article; a thorough evaluation and overhaul are badly needed. I have reduced the article rating to "C" in view of the multiple problems with this article as it stands today. Reify-tech (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

60s[edit]

Missing a big chunk of the protests in the 1960s that temporarily closed the school and formed the Union of Concerned Scientists among other organizations czar 06:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]