Talk:Holy Ground (song)

Holy Ground (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 7, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 October 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Red (Taylor Swift album) .

A fact from Holy Ground (song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the beat in Taylor Swift's song "Holy Ground" was described by Brad Nelson of The Atlantic as "insistent enough to act as punctuation for the lyrics"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Holy Ground (song).

Wikipedia

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Holy Ground (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tkbrett (talk · contribs) 18:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review to come. Tkbrett (✉) 18:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Swift wrote "Holy Ground" and came into the studio with producer Jeff Bhasker one day ... This part of the sentence is strange to me. Does it mean she wrote the song and introduced it to Bhasker in the course of a single day? If not, it ought to be reworded or maybe just omitted.
Reflecting on the incident, Swift thought to herself, ... "Swift thought to herself" is strange since I'm not sure how we would know that. Just cutting it to Reflecting on the incident, Swift expressed: ... is clearer.
Avoid using "noted" in two places (MOS:SAID).
By MOS:BODY, I'd consider merging the Commercial performance into another section since its only three sentences. Maybe Production and release or Critical reception.

Copyvio is a good 13.8%. No copyright issues.
Image checks out as CC.

Apologies this review took so long to get to Ippantekina. Anyway, as you can see above I don't have many issues. I'm glad I picked it up though because I probably never would've heard this song – I think Perone is right that its worth a listen for the casual listeners like myself. Tkbrett (✉) 19:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks so much for taking up this review. I’m glad you gave this song a listen; it was one of the tracks that convinced me to take Swift’s music seriously. I’m currently on a trip so please allow me some delay in finishing the nom. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ippantekina, I made you wait long enough for the review, so please take all the time you need. Enjoy your trip. Tkbrett (✉) 16:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Tkbrett:, I believe all issues are addressed now. Let me know if the article needs more work. Thank you very much for your patience! Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good Ippantekina. ✓ Pass Tkbrett (✉) 02:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the beats in Taylor Swift's song "Holy Ground" were described by Brad Nelson of The Atlantic as being "insistent enough to act as punctuation for the lyrics"? Source: Nelson, Brad (November 1, 2012). "If You Listen Closely, Taylor Swift Is Kind of Like Leonard Cohen". The Atlantic.
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not needed: this is my second DYK nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Ippantekina (talk). Nominated by Unlimitedlead at 14:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

@Unlimitedlead: Great article. Hook is interesting and cited, article is copyvio free, and it's new enough.

I approve this nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]