Talk:Homosexuality and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

I need help fixing a dual link here please, found it but can't fix it

I found two links to President Hinckley's page on this article and tried to remove the second one, but the site's not working. Can someone fix this please? 67.8.232.45 (talk) 12:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Bit one sided

Really needs a bit from the other side. There are LDS LGBT groups (alphabet soup!) and campaigners, and it would be interesting to hear more about them. Also official statements on the subject have varied and changed over the years to an extent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.193.146 (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

If all is not quite well, things do at least read better today ... Onward and upward Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 22:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Black and white depression photo

I can't find the WP guideline just now, but aren't photos that are meant to be representative of depression and mental health that feature people in black and white huddled on the ground considered stigmatising/inappropriate? Sxologist (talk) 07:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)