Talk:Honduras national under-20 football team

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Honduras Low‑importance

	Honduras portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Honduras, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Honduras on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HondurasWikipedia:WikiProject HondurasTemplate:WikiProject HondurasHonduras articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Move?[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No move. 199.125.109.102 (talk) 05:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honduras national under-20 football team → Honduras U-20 football team — The title: "Honduras national under-20 football team" is improper as it. Please, can it be changed to the proper title, which is "Honduras U-20 football team"? — Oak27FTW
Why? To most people "U-20" sounds more like a German submarine than any sort of fooball team. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Read Wikipedia:official names, which attempts to explain the official Wikipedia policy on article names as it applies in cases such as this. It's a policy that often seems wrong to newcomers, but there are reasons for it! And of course the policy can in theory be changed, and it's often suggested it should but it never gets far. So not to be taken lightly. Andrewa (talk) 18:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - the current title is far clearer, and matches the majority of other similar articles. - fchd (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - no rationale based on consensus as described in policy is given for the suggested change, and I see no obvious one. Since the term U20 is used in the article, it seems a reasonable redirect however (created) --Rogerb67 (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.