This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
To be added (machine translated): “Section 4 is used in the future on the legal provisions in force. The "Public Order Ordinance," for example, because of its provisions and the "Convention" inconsistent, so was amended in 1995. As the "Rights" was legal in Hong Kong enjoys a position of supremacy, so the composition of the pro-China Council considered a violation of the "Basic Law" and Article 2, paragraph 3, 3 and 4 in the transfer of sovereignty after the abolition, not adopted as laws of the Region, but also the "Public Order Ordinance" and "Covenant" part to restore conflict.” – Kaihsu (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
