This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Please clarify whether this is a real physical system or "alternative physics"[edit]
I don't mean "alternative physics" in any disparaging way — one of my favorite exam questions of all time was when I was asked to figure out how the black-body law would look if photons were fermions instead of bosons. In my view this is a perfectly respectable line of inquiry.
But if that's the sort of thing the article is about, I think it at least needs to make that clear.
So is this a real thing that you could create/detect in an arbitrarily well-funded laboratory? Or is it a kind of counterfactual? No need to answer me here necessarily; just please clarify it in the article. --Trovatore (talk) 02:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure this is a thought experiment rather than a hypothesized substance. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
