Talk:Hooray Henry/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 11:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Given the topic of the article, the article meets all the conditions for being a GA! Happy to pass without any comments. Congratulations. :) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
That was quick, thanks. I was hoping to find some academic material on it discussing it and how discrimination works both ways and to try to provide perhaps some input from somebody from the upper class on the matter but all I could find is a blog. I suppose "toff" would be more likely to have more discussion of it in sociology books, but this really is the best I can do on this for now.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)