Talk:Hopper hut

Portals

I've only added Kent as a portal, as this is where the main relevance of the article is to. Feel free to add other counties if this is appropriate. Mjroots (talk) 23:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Hopper hut → Hop pickers — Over-precision. There is a strong need for an article about hop-pickers ("hoppers") containing material that does not fit in hops and which could, conceivably, take some of the material that is in hops at present. Three articles, on hops, hop pickers and hoppers' huts would be excessive. Hoppers' huts could fit in to an article on hoppers and, in fact, is inextricably linked with PART but NOT all of what would go into an article titled Hoppers" or "Hop pickers". The need for hoppers' huts as an item within the coverage of "architectural history" could be covered by a redirect.

An article about hoppers should cover:

1. Agricultural geography and history of hop growing, in the interaction of these with labour market.

2. The activity of hop picking -- hourly yield, working conditions whilst picking (separate from residence), any physical / medical dangers or benefits.

3. The economics of hop picking -- wages, income to farmer, income to middle man, the Hop Exchange (itself of architectural interest), trends over the years, demand, shortages, transportation, impact on beer production.

4. Demographics -- numbers of pickers who lived in urban areas close enough to fields to travel there daily, and numbers who stayed on farms; where they came from.

5. Accommodation -- numbers living in hoppers' huts and numbers living in barns that were NOT built specially for them.

6. Campaign to improve conditions.

7. Hop picking in literature -- including work of George Orwell.

8. The "hop pickers' children" photograph that was a major propaganda coup in World War II. The appearance of this on the cover page of Life that has been described as a major factor in swinging U.S. public opinion to support of the U.S. entering the war. This impacts many issues, that include military history, propaganda, magazine cover pictures, ...

9. The controversy, in late 2010, concerning the reproduction of this picture on cover of Times Literary Supplement.

10. If the title is hop picking, instead of hoppers, then it could include information on the machiner and economics of the activity.

I hope this is not controversial, but I get the impression that in wiki culture anything is, so I am being cautious. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 18:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

• Oppose This seems a perfectly valid article about a type of building, in the same way that we have articles at Watermill, Bothy, Library, Church or Mountain hut, to name just five of the very many examples about buildings. All of these could, on the lines suggested by the proposer, be rolled into articles on Corn miller, Outdoor worker, Book reader, Christian worshipper or Mountain climber. There may well be a case for a separate article on the lines that the proposer is suggesting, but converting this article into it isn't really the way to do it. Incidentally, if an article is created on the occupation, it should really be in the singular form at Hop picker. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

• Indecision I do NOT object to a responsible article about hoppers' huts, if this does not preclude an article about hop picking (I am leaning to that title because it allows inclusion of mechanization. If someone can provide an example of a trio of articles about subject X, people whose occupation is X, and buildings for people whose occupation is X -- e.g. Nursing, Nurses, Nurses' Homes -- then I will withdraw request. Michael P. Barnett (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hopper hut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907115508/http://www.kent-life.co.uk/the-magazine-places-town-on-a-ten-pound-note--6693 to http://www.kent-life.co.uk/the-magazine-places-town-on-a-ten-pound-note--6693

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)