Talk:Hoppo (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Camelcase not found in 3rd party sources[edit]

http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/articulo/espectaculos/musica/2016/04/14/ruben-albarran-presenta-proyecto-musical-hoppo-0 and so on. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 December 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 16:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hoppo (band)HopPo! – The title was undiscussed. Also per WP:SMALLDETAILS/WP:TITLECHANGESGeorge Ho (talk) 01:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC) --Relisting.Sam Sailor 02:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
And seriously, shouldn't this be merged into Rubén Albarrán? "The album has not been commercially released, and was only available as a promotional CD in 2010. However, the songs can be streamed through Hoppo's official MySpace page." MySpace isn't a WP:RS source. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to either Hoppo! (band) or Hoppo!. "HopPo!" is just a stylization, the same goes with HopPo! (album). © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 01:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • So is the "!". We never retain those from logos unless independent sources almost uniformly also do so (the only case I can think of is Yahoo!, and there are many failed attempts to promote its inclusion, e.g. to move Pink (singer) to "P!nk").  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  03:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • HeLl nO! Oppose any weird stylization to mimic the logo, per MOS:TM. It should stay at the present title.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  03:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The current title seems easier to read, and more recognisable. Tony (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and also fix HopPo! (album). I don't see any case for this weird style that even most references avoid. Dicklyon (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.