Talk:Hu (mythology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hu (mythology)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
I Feel it is quite unjustified to relate Vak in a sexuality portal article Hu. Vak has nothing to do with ejaculation and as because this artical is in connection with masturbation and is in the sexulity portal, this will deliver a negative and wrong conception about Vak. Vak is depiction of a female; the daughter of Rishi Avrin, who had realized the Brahman. It was her realization of primal unification of all universe; that is depicted in Vak sukta. It has nothing in common with sexual sence. Its speedy deletion is demanded. Why Nasadiya Sukta is given as a link to it? Is Nasadiya sukta a sex verse? It is Hymn of creation of the universe. Such articles will hurt Hinduism and Buddhism adherents. Delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sevenseas (talkcontribs) 13:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)