Talk:Human rights in Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan Mid‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human rights in Azerbaijan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140214120404/http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php to http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Human Rights in Azerbaijan[edit]

Dear Operator873, I provided valid sources for edits, but you reverted or eliminated them. I could not understand why you did this. Thank you. Human7777 (talk) 07:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Human7777: I went back and reviewed the changes you've made. Upon closer inspection, I have reinstated the edits. I believe the reason I initially reverted the edits were due to losing references and the uncertainty behind that action. That being said, Divot made some edits creating Wikilinks that were undone in the process which will need to be replaced. Thanks for sending me a message and requesting a second look. Operator873^CONNECT 21:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Operator873: Thank you. Human7777 (talk) 05:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV And undue weight tagging[edit]

I have added a pov check and undue weight tag to the article. Official Azerbaijan websites cannot be seriously used to make absolute assertions about a countries human rights record or claims about its freedom of religion or minorities rights. Neutral sources that talk about those subjects need to be used. What a countries constitution says is irrelevant if it is not backed up by neutral sources that prove statements and assertions made on paper exist in practice in real life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.131.74 (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the NPOV tag on the basis that none of the .az sites currently linked to in the article are used for assertions regarding the country's human rights record; they are uniformly applied to statements of fact. Kurtis ^(talk) 20:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]