Talk:Hurricane (Eden Golan song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Hurricane" is a song by Israeli-Russian singer Eden Golan[edit]

why have you mentioned "Russian"? "Unicorn" is a song by Israeli singer-songwriter Noa Kirel.

I.M" is a song by Israeli singer Michael Ben David

"Toy" (Hebrew transliteration: טוי) is a song recorded by Israeli singer Netta Barzilai.

and I can go on and on.

84.110.218.178 (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 April 2024[edit]

Insert: Israel, with the help of the US, UK, Germany and others are committing a genocide, right now. Please boycott the Eurovision if you don't support genocide of the Palestinians. Over 35,000 are murdered so far, over 70% are women and children.

(If you're the person reading this suggested inclusion, its time to take a your stand for humanity. Do it!) 137.191.235.66 (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 16:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 May 2024[edit]

Eden Golan is Israeli, not Israeli-Russian. 2A06:C701:4D1B:B401:CB53:D05E:CF02:107D (talk) 08:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 10:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane was 2nd in ESC2024 televote[edit]

Hurricane was 2nd in ESC2024 televote. This relevant information should be mentioned in the introduction of the article. Buffaldrino (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane (Eden Golan song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 19:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Hi, @Nascar9919! I'll be reviewing this article as soon as possible. I don't promise to be that fast, but I will try to be as fast as possible because I know how frustrating it is to wait so long. Very recent, yes, but I see that it is very stable. Best, Santi (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you so much for taking this on. Don't worry about rushing through this; I know this deals with a very complicated subject. Feel free to take as much time as you need. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • tc) 19:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]