Talk:Hurricane Florence (2000)

Hurricane Florence (2000) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Florence (2000) is part of the 2000 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 23, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 14, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Todo[edit]

Expand it or merge it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

We need references for Florence not being retired in 2001, used in 2006, and being on the 2012 hurricane list. I corrected several typos already and added some convert templates, so I'll leave the added references up to you. They should be easy to find. Otherwise, the article should be in good shape. The prose appears well-written and encyclopedaic. Since the storm didn't strike anyone, images are restricted to satellite imagery and track, which is fine. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It passes. And the crowd goes wild... Thegreatdr (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to thank David Roth for the wonderful suggestion of inflating the refs in the article, and my parents for buying me this computer, and the National Hurricane Center for having such good archives and information. WHOO! :) ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One minor issue: Month Day (e.g. "May 22") should not be wikilinked, unless it is part of a full date (e.g. May 22, 2008), per WP:MOS. Otherwise, great work! Dr. Cash (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to be a pain, but MOS:SYL seems to say it is fine to link a month day like May 23. Could you explain exactly which section of the MoS says that? Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Florence (2000). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]