Talk:Hurricane Inga

Hurricane Inga has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 12, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hurricane Inga in September and October 1969 is the third longest-lived Atlantic hurricane on record, having lasted 25 days?

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Inga (1969)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The issue I see in this article is reference-related. References 2 through 14 do not go to the source of the information used within the article, they only direct the user to the main storm wallet archive page. Fix these reference links, and I'll pass the article. Everything else appears good. Reviewer: Thegreatdr (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, forgot about that!

Doing... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where to find the specific advisory links actually. The relevant storm wallet seems more-or-less empty. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a significant problem. The article does need to be adequately sourced. If the original references are no longer on the NHC website, substitute references are needed. I'm not going to quick fail the article...there are four more days left within the review period to fix this referencing problem. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't object to failing this for now, until I figure out how to source it adequately. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's still time. I know how long I end up waiting for articles to be reviewed for GA, and wouldn't want you to needlessly have to go through it again. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ive found them [1] - The number had slipped from 11 to 06Jason Rees (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. But those aren't the public advisories, rather the tropical discussions. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression it was the disscussions you were after but o well Public ones are here as well Jason Rees (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks! :) Done now. Thanks to everyone for their help and patience. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I have passed its GAN. Congratulations to all involved. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Inga (1969). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110104030026/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1969.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1969.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 June 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) SkyWarrior 14:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC) SkyWarrior 14:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Inga (1969) → Hurricane Inga – I think it's pretty obvious why this should have the main title (longevity, only hurricane named Inga). Essentially, this is basically a speedy rename proposal if you'd say. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 02:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Yep. Unnecessary disambiguation - basename already redirects to current disambiguated title. --В²C ☎ 18:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.