Talk:Hurricane Marty (2015)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Marty (2015) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hurricane Marty (2015) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Marty (2015) is part of the 2015 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 10, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed
June 8, 2019	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
March 16, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Marty (2015)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria[edit]

Well-written:

The article's grammar, as well as its general layout, comply with MOS policies. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article incorporates citations from a decently-sized list of reputable sources. There are no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

It looks as though the article sufficiently covers all enyclopedically relevant ateas of its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains a neutral tone. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since its creation last Autumn, the article has not been subjected to edit warring or any similar disruptions. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All three images used in the article are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Due to being public domain, none of them risk fair use violation by being used here. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

I believe this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]