Talk:IBM JX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This was the first computer I used as a kid. It most certainly ran standard PC software, although it didn't take standard ISA adapter cards, just like the PCjr.

When we got this computer, it ran DOS 2.11, which made the 3.5" drives "pretend" to be 360kB drives. We later upgraded to DOS 3.21, which supported 720kB disks. It also supported an external 10MB hard disk. It was binary compatible with all manner of DOS software as was common during that day, such as Flight Simulator II, IBM PASCAL compiler, etc.

The article states that it only accessed the first 40 tracks. Did it really use only the 40 tracks or did it double-step and use only the odd tracks on 80 track drives? --Matthiaspaul (talk) 23:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IBM JX compatibility[edit]

The JX was my first ever computer. In 1984, it was well known that Flight Simulator was the standard test for PC compatibility. So I made certain that this machine could run FS before I bought it. The article is wrong on that point. It definitely ran FS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.93.113 (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IBM JX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]