Talk:IBM Remote Supervisor Adapter

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Definantly there are some changes needed here. It is outdated and does not reflect unbiased information. I will contribute, but let it be known that I work for IBM. However, I work for IBM on the customer side and am familiar with the limitations and criticism directed against the RSA II. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctustison (talk • contribs) 11:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the rants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctustison (talk • contribs) 11:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for IBM, you should be trying to fix the issues identified on this page rather than trying to introduce corporate bias into Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AshtonBenson (talk • contribs) 21:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add some cloesup images of the plugs of the internal RSAII connector cable 73P9312? (Both ends and front and back of the plug that goes into the motherboard). For fixing broken connector-cables by comparing cable-colors with the layout of your original cable... Or maybe even write down the complete pin-layout of both connectors? Thanx --Votanxerxes (talk) 16:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed patent claim[edit]

Removed the claim of the technology being based on a specific patent as it was based on the author´s interpretation of a primary source alone, as per WP:NOTRS: "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors."

Minstrel1977 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]