Talk:IBM Tivoli Access Manager

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I need to understand why IBM Tivoli Access Manager is in Wikipedia at all given it is a blatant advertisement for IBM's product and it does not add to the "encyclopedic" knowledge that wikipedia strives to capture!

It is a piece of software, it's existence should be documented in Wikipedia. I agree that this needs to be more "encyclopedic" and less of an advertisement, though. Discussion of the actual technology involved would be a start. 157.83.125.12 (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"New page"[edit]

User:Викидим: I'm not sure why this is being reviewed as a "new page" given it has existed since 2006? It was deleted as an uncontested PROD and then undeleted, but I don't think that makes it "new". SomethingForDeletion (talk) 04:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess due to these actions it got "unreviewed" and into the WP:NPP queue. There are many pages that get into this queue, not necessarily new ones. I prefer to patrol the older pages, that's all. Викидим (talk) 04:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]