Talk:IIT Gandhinagar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

EDIT needed? Saying the core focus is on engineering/technology would dilute the aim and vision of IITGN to become a comprehensive public university without hard boundaries of departments and have lot of weightage for many different academic interests (and not only for engg/tech). See for example other IITs (like HYD, INDORE, etc). So, perhaps we should just say a public university and cut the over emphasis on engg at the start of the page.

Proposed merge with Amalthea (technical summit)[edit]

This article has already been blown up once per WP:TNT, and the subject has been covered for years by a (very out of date) section of the target. The conference actually has notability, but the repeated efforts to create an independent article have been plagued by the inexperience of the editor, who is trying to create a 'long' article out of the worst of the available sources. This needs to be developed as a subtopic of the university article, and then (possibly) eventually forked once it is reasonably developed through use of reliable sources rather than the ones that are currently in the article. Reventtalk 11:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In present case, there's not really any national/wide coverage on the subject and all sources are either primary, unreliable or local newspapers. It is just a technical summit of an institute that happens once a year and would serve a better informative page within the parent article which itself is not a very lengthy and in fact is outdated and heavily based on primary and unreliable sources, -and therefore have enough space to include in more contents to improve itself. We should better improve the IIT Gandhinagar article by merging reliably sourced contents from 'Amalthea' article (There'd be however no more than 5-6 lines, 7 at best).
We can't have a separate article on each and every local chapter/s of a notable topic. It is also very unlikely that subject has much scope of expansion beyond the present shape. It has a very short history and happens once a year, and is covered by few local newspapers. That'd be okay to cover within the parent article. Well, it can be forked out to create a separate article, -only when the parent article becomes too lengthy and tedious to read/navigate through.
A separate article at present will only serve the purpose of promotion and very likely constitute original research, and will certainly not result in an encyclopedia article. As, it is a stub now --and in the history section, it reads, Amalthea in its foundation year 2010, started off with a conclave of wide range of speakers[..]. It is exactly the same concern it was deleted for, few days ago at AfD. I look forward to hearing more comments. P.S. -Comments including WP:OSE will not help. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. The first three seem to work, the last three don't. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]