Talk:iMac G4

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Museum of Modern Art

	This article is related to the Museum of Modern Art.Museum of Modern ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Museum of Modern ArtTemplate:WikiProject Museum of Modern ArtMuseum of Modern Art-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Sorry, i removed this G4 computer from the category:Industrial design examples

This computer was not successful enough.

Stef

First off, this computer was not successful enough, according to whom? Secondly since when is product that sells well a prerequisite for an industrial design example? I'm sure you meant no harm (actually I'm just being polite, I'm sure you did, but it is OK, I forgive you) but please do not remove something from a category due to only personal POVTrevorLSciAct 02:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of providing sources should be upon those who think it should be placed in the category. Where is your source? Otherwise claiming it to be an industry design example is personal POV. Mdwh (talk) 02:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No comment, so I'm removing. It occurs to me though that this entire category is a POV magnet - by what criterion is something added to this category? Mdwh (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RAM in this[edit]

The RAM is in fact in two separate parts. One is under the motherboard and the other is actually on the motherboard.Fletcherbrian (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to add this fact to the article? If so you can do it yourself "MonkeyWithGlasses44" (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]