Talk:IQVIA

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 March 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Ssgajimouli (talk · contribs) has been paid by TPG Capital. Their editing has included contributions to this article. TPG owns Novotech per this ref. Connection disclosed here

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Notice: This article WP:A to establish WP:CORP[edit]

In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Hoverzy (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case.

—triwbe (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Flagged articles[edit]

I have removed the [[Category:Flagged articles]] from the message above … it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, but the current version looks good to me. ^Avicenna_sis @ 06:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely Important Article[edit]

In my opinion, It is an extremely important article. it may not be written in the way in which it is needed, but is very important article as it is about one of the giants in clinical research. Dr. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 09:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IMS merger[edit]

Some editors have wanted to add this information, followed by my reverts provided with a summary that news is not encyclopedic per WP:NOTNEWS. A merger of this size is important for the clinical research industry, but merger talks sometimes fail before consummation (which is expected in the 2nd half of this year), and this industry has seen that happen before between major players. As I have said in my reverts, this is a news story until it completes, then it is a new fact worthy of being in the article.

Also of note for editing is that this article has been reduced extensively over recent years (mainly by me) due to its previous puffery and self-promotion about Quintiles as the "world's greatest company" or something similar. See the WP guidance on WP:COI (suspected Quintiles employees adding content; review History and first entry on this Talk page above), WP:PEA, WP:SOAP and WP:IINFO, all of which apply to numerous previous reverted entries for this article. I do not claim ownership of this article and would not revert good content sourced with WP:SECONDARY, but haven't seen encyclopedic quality of edits being made, so I continue with surveillance. --Zefr (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with OneKey[edit]

Onekey is now an IQVIA product. https://www.iqvia.com/en/locations/united-states/commercial-operations/essential-information/onekey-reference-assets/onekey-web Rogermx (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is full form of IQVIA?[edit]

I am trying to find answer to this question since long but could not find any answer. Maybe this information can be put in this article when someone finds this information with proper sources. Thanks in advance. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:41, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Google search provided this explanation: "A year after its initial launch as QuintilesIMS, the pharma service provider has re-launched as IQVIA. Its new name maintains parts of its original formation, with the ‘I’ representing IMS and the ‘Q’ taken from Quintiles. However, the latter and newest part of the name - ‘via’ - is representative of “seeking to inspire and ignite real change via a new path forward”, explains Ari Bousbib, chief executive officer of IQVIA." --Zefr (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks a lot. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 09:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ALL CAPS title[edit]

There are multiple examples of the no all-caps-in-titles rule being enforced. Should be enforced evenly and this page should be Moved to "Iqvia" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:E047:900:5C6D:3E0:85D1:B2F9 (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]