Talk:Ibanez Destroyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I removed the cleanup tag from this article because, quite frankly, I thought it was useless. Indicating that something is wrong with the article is nice but it isn't of any value without specifying why. If someone would explain what is in nonconformance, I would be happy to edit the article.

TheDestroyerGuy (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize there is a lack of source material cited for the majority of the content of this article.

Most of the knowledge that I have obtained regarding the Ibanez Destroyer model comes first hand as I possess a private collection of over 20 Destroyer models and variations.

I'm not certain how to reference that direct observational knowledge within the article so I thought it best to place a note here.

TheDestroyerGuy (talk) 20:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The problem, obviously, is that it's original research. Not only are the facts in question since other editors cannot verify them, but a lack of verifiability also suggests that a lot of information in the article is not, in fact, notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. Look, for instance, at what happened to Peavey Bandit. Drmies (talk) 02:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • have removed the "Famous Destroyer players" section for the same reasons TheDestroyerGuy (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nice collection, by the way. Still, don't you wish you'd been collecting Les Pauls? You'd be rich now! ;) Drmies (talk) 15:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Still, don't you wish you'd been collecting Les Pauls?". No, I'd be broke TheDestroyerGuy (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think I've cleaned up everything. I even removed the photo gallery which I found rather ironic in a way. It seems Wikipedia is willing to allow me to upload a photo of anything and take it on faith that the object in the image is what I claim it to be yet it does not do the same for the printed word. If there is anything else I need to clean up, please let me know. Thanks. TheDestroyerGuy (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't spam up the article with your link, you know where to post links ;) in the links section at the bottom of the page... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.103.113.177 (talk) 13:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

there's not an easy way to say this without the risk of offending TheDestroyerGuy... I myself have a small collection of ibanez instruments amongst thirty-odd basses, & they are wonderful instruments... but to the point: there's no mention within the article of the gibson/epiphone korina explorer, whose 1958 design this guitar exactly copies. can someone explain why? I think the whole history of japanese manufacturers building extremely high quality replicas of US guitars, & particularly how it led to innovation (such as e.g. the iceman) is being ignored here. duncanrmi (talk) 18:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see somebody's fixed it. :-)

duncanrmi (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ibanez Destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]