Talk:Identi.ca

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Notability[edit]

This does not meet criteria for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7 as it is about a new of software.

identi.ca is the first site and testbed for laconi.ca, an significant new entrant into the microblogging arena

Mattlhanson (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

227 posts about it in the past 24 hours: [1] 143.231.249.141 (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation[edit]

It's not much, but http://identi.ca/notice/19345 . --ESP (talk) 01:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better than nothing! VanTucky 02:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

Concern has been raised by an editor on Talk:Laconica as to whether it is notable enough for an article. I think it would be better suited as part of this article, not least because I have heard it will probably be renamed to "Identi.ca" as well. — Hex (❝?!❞) 23:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been able to add criticism[edit]

I added some criticism about Wikipedia. Some things I came across, while I researched about Identi.ca for my own. So I added it. It got removed, because of the lack of references. I haven't added them, because I did my research in other languages. I made a note about that it needs more references. Later I added some references. Some things from the original site. I 'claimed' there were some 'remove me' accounts, so I added links to them of references, so everyone can see this is true. I 'claimed' that you can only remove your account by directly contacting the admin. As reference, I added the official Wiki stating this, as well as a blog and an ask-like website. Besides this I verified this myself - I know and understand, why this isn't valid, but I just want you to know it is true. The paragraph got removed "The notability of this weasel-word-heavy section is unsupported by any reliable sources. Removing." Okay, maybe it weasel-word-heavy. So, why don't you fix it? However, the argument that there are no reliable sources is simply not true. It's a fact and besides some website the official wiki confirms it. Notability? It seems Identi.ca is the only social network without an option to remove an account, which does make a difference when everyone complains about everything staying online forever in social networks. Yes, maybe the quality was bad. So it would be nice, if someone with more experience could write this. I just wanted to give some feedback and so I give up. Good luck to all future editors! --212.17.86.234 (talk) 11:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The question is, is this actually criticism? Is it notable criticism I guess is what I mean. Has this been covered in third party sources? That would be the key thing for me. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

infobox: licence?[edit]

Most software has licence info in infoboxes, can we put licence info on the identica/reddit/etc. infoboxes too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwibird (talk • contribs) 12:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I modified {{Infobox Website}} to have a "content license" parameter, and have added it to this article. — Hex (❝?!❞) 11:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Language : only english since the migration to pump.io — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.238.166.143 (talk) 18:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. --AVRS (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did identi.ca change in 2013 to a promotional tool for pump.io?[edit]

I've only visited the site a half dozen times, but I thought I used to be able to go to identi.ca and search for friends or topics etc. Now all I see is a big notice about pump.io. Am I remembering wrong? If not, this should be noted in the article (beyond the current note about using pump.io). Gronky (talk) 19:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Identi.ca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://status.net/2013/03/26/no-more-new-registrations-on-identi-ca
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080708073815/http://identi.ca:80/notice/19345 to http://identi.ca/notice/19345

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Identi.ca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]