Talk:If I Needed Someone/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HeyJude70 (talk · contribs) 07:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Well written. Clearly makes points and facts.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Clearly sectioned, separated into appropriate sections comprised of information accurate to the section.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	140 sources provided to verify all information.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Citations are derived from reliable sources, and the layout used allows for the in-line citations to be directed to a summary of the original source under the 'Sources' tab.
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	All original.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	All details are of the song. Any extreme details in necessary (such as the 'Composition' section).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	(No edit wars)
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are accounted for with rationales.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Well-captioned
	7. Overall assessment.	Easy pass. Article is very well written and a lot of time has been spent making the article as accurate, reliable and detailed as possible while following the guidelines for a good article.

HeyJude70: wow, thanks so much. I just take a day's break from Wikipedia and not only has the GA review started, but it's all wrapped up as well! Cheers, JG66 (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]