Talk:Igtisadchi Baku

Azerbaijan Mid‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volleyball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volleyball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Volleyball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolleyballWikipedia:WikiProject VolleyballTemplate:WikiProject VolleyballVolleyball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Content[edit]

Is completely inapropiate to add the whole 2012-2013 Azerbaijan Women's Volleyball Super League program here. Osplace 23:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Igtisadchi Baku[edit]

Dear user. I have seen your passion on editing the Igtisadchi Baku article. I want you to know that in general, we, here in Wikipedia, do not follow scores for every single team in it's article. Wikipedia is not a place for promotion. The main reason that, from my point of view, the results are inappropiate there is because there is already an article named 2012-2013 Azerbaijan Women's Volleyball Super League, and all results are shown there, those are appropiate there. Would you consider to agree leave the Igtisadchi Baku article without seasonal results, as before? Osplace 13:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that you have not answer, neither here, not in the article talk. For the CEV cup results, you have something written about the participation. You should included a referenced information in the history sectiong about it stating that the team participated in the 2012 season and explain how far they went, but the way you are presenting the results is inappropiate. Please, is completely the same! The results in the 2012-2013 Azerbaijan Women's Volleyball Super League article and the one you are including here. For this results I cannot see another way to talk about them. According to the wikipedia policy of WP:RAWDATA, "Where it is not necessary, ... omit excess statistics altogether and summarize any necessary data concisely." Osplace 14:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:Osplace#Igtisadchi Baku[edit]

Sorry I did not answer you before now, I am not good at English grammar but I understand what you write. The schedule of the first round and 2013 CEV Cup have before I made it. I just updated results and add the schedule of the round 2-4. I just started using wikipedia. User talk:Arjari 20:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3O Response: It does appear that this information is already provided at the Super League page linked above. Regardless, this content is not appropriate for this page. See WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. I would recommend deleting it and including a link to the 2012-2013 season instead. — Bdb484 (talk) 02:44, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering Bdb484, I will remove both, Super League and CEV Cup results per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Both can be presented in another way more appropiate. Osplace 16:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Igtisadchi Baku. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130429124921/http://avf.az/ru/news/130/ to http://avf.az/ru/news/130/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]