Talk:Imperium (Harris novel)

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Great read[edit]

Amazing book. Just look what it did to my screen name! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cicero IV (talk • contribs) 06:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RobertHarris Imperium.jpg[edit]

Image:RobertHarris Imperium.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'One problem in the book lies in Robert Harris' dating system. He refers to the months of "July" and "August" in the course of the novel, yet a young Julius Caesar is one of the characters, which so obviously predates the naming of those months.' This is uncited so I'd be removing it anyway, but it's doubly silly because Harris's intent was no doubt to reduce confusion for readers who might be unfamiliar with Roman calary practices. Just another instance of pointless Wikipedia pedantry.--71.37.5.216 (talk) 22:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another great Harris novel[edit]

Robert Harris is currently one of the best British contemporary writers and I have written a plot summary of this very politicised historical novel with all its twists and turns. As some of the plaudits to the novel suggest, Robert Harris is the natural successor to John Le Carre and his novels are of a similar merit to books like 'The Perfect Spy' and the Smiley series.

Imperium successfully draws the reader into the life of the young Cicero and Lustrum (novel) carries on from where the first novel leaves off, following his career in the Roman Senate until he is forced to flee Rome in danger of his life. Like all Harris's novels, the research is meticulous and his ability to recreate the atmosphere of Roman life at the time is remarkable, down to the smallest details of particular smells, sounds and colours! Ivankinsman (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Serialisation[edit]

Anyone know if the BBC production was abridged or not?A Taxed Mind (talk) 20:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]