Talk:Inès de Bourgoing/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 09:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Dr. Blofeld looking forward to you improvement suggestions. SusunW (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Will review later this evening!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

@SusunW: Sorry for the delay, I've been flat out with the contest. Very little to complain about:

• Link any places not already linked in Fez, Kenitra, Marrakech, Meknes, Mogador, Oujda, Rabat, Safi and Taza.

 Done SusunW (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• Link château de Thorey-Lyautey, presumably there should be an article on the chateau itself Aymatth2 (talk · contribs) might be able to create that one!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

I linked to the article on French WP. Is that sufficient, or must we create the article? SusunW (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• "Not only had she cared for wounded soldiers, she had turned to the weak and the poor without any concern for race, gender or faith" -watch tone here, promotes her a little too much as a heroine.

Revised the language to be more neutral. SusunW (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• "Colonel Pierre Geoffroy who enjoyed close associations with the Lyauteys," -

"Colonel Pierre Geoffroy, a close associate of the Lyauteys"?

 Done SusunW (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• "On 7 July 2002, on the 140th anniversary of her birth, a small area on the first floor of the Château de Thorey-Lyautey was opened by Senator Philippe de Bourgoing and Count Pierre de Bourgoing in memory of Inès de Bourgoing. It contains photographs and other historical artefacts in a building which is otherwise dedicated to the life of her husband Hubert Lyautey.[24]" -she hasn't died yet LOL, why is this before death? Move to "Death and legacy" section

Moved.--Ipigott (talk) 14:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the review Dr. Blofeld I think I have addressed your concerns. Advise if we need to do anything further. SusunW (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. A OK.!

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)