Talk:In Haven

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

This article was nominated for deletion on May 21, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Lute Song?[edit]

I can find nothing that mentions "Lute Song" in connection with "Love alone will stay" (later revised as "In Haven") in Elgar literature other than in Michael Kennedy's "Portrait of Elgar", which as follows:

Page 311: Index, Solo Songs: "LOVE ALONE WILL STAY (LUTE SONG) 47, 71, 283".

Page 47: passing reference to 'Love Alone will Stay'.

Page 71: About Sea Pictures: "One of then, No. 2, 'In Haven' to words by Alice Elgar, had been written as early as 30 May 1897, when it was called 'Love Alone will Stay' and had been published as 'Lute Song' in The Dome in January 1898." [No, it wasn't]

Page 283: Chrononogical List of Works at the back of his book: "1897 Choral and vocal: Song, Love Alone Will Stay (Lute Song) (C. A. Elgar), for voice and pianoforte. Written 30 May 1897. Publisher: The Dome, 1898. Revised, orchestrated, and corporated inot Sea Pictures, op. 37, No. 2, 1899 as In Haven (Capri).

I have The Dome published New Year's Day mdcccxcviii with me here: It is in the Inventory and on page 90 as 'Love Alone will Stay'. 'Lute Song' is not mentioned. Therefore I removed reference to "Lute Song" from the pages "Love alone will stay" and "In Haven (Capri)". P0mbal (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have noted that the words to another song of Elgar's, "Queen Mary's Song" are from Tennyson's Lute Song. P0mbal (talk) 15:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should write to Michael Kennedy via his publishers. If the book goes to a further edition then he can make a correction. Good work BTW! Nunquam Dormio (talk) 09:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Love alone will stay[edit]

We have a very similar page to this for Love alone will stay. Is there a point to keeping them separate or should we merge Love alone will stay into this article? Nunquam Dormio (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They were published on separate occasions - one gave birth to the other. A constructive idea. Merge if you like, but obviously Love alone will stay should redirect to In Haven. P0mbal (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In Haven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526112804/http://www.robertmeadmore.com/music.html to http://www.robertmeadmore.com/music.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]