Talk:In rem jurisdiction
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the In rem page were merged into In rem jurisdiction. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Definition of "In rem jurisdiction"[edit]
Currently, this article starts with "In rem jurisdiction (Latin, "power about or against 'the thing'"[1])" where [1] cites Black's Law Dictionary.
I don't believe it. I think Black's Law Dictionary defines "in rem jurisdiction" and does not claim that "jurisdiction" is Latin for anything. The only Latin part of that is "in rem" which means, "made or availing against or affecting a thing."
Accordingly, I am adjusting the paragraph accordingly. DavidForthoffer (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Adding section on Canada[edit]
The article is currently focused primarily on the United States, with a brief section on China. I plan to add a section explaining in rem jurisdiction in Canada, including examples of cases, similar to the section on the United States. All of this is in an effort to improve the global perspective of this article. I also note I'm a law student at the University of New Brunswick, undertaking this editing as part of an assignment. MusicalLawyer (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
The new material is a very general overview. I hope in the future more information can be added, and that information about other jurisdictions might be included. MusicalLawyer (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)