Crime and Criminal Biography High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Other countries[edit]

Untitled[edit]

In this article only New-Zeeland is mentioned as a country, where Incitement in principle is always punishable.

(Also) according to this article [[1]] in the Netherlands this is the case as well, be it that there it ("Uitlokking") is punished equally heavy as committing itselve.

(See this sentence: "De deelnemingsvormen die in artikel 47 Sr worden genoemd (doen plegen, medeplegen en uitlokken) worden net zo zwaar gestraft als wanneer men de werkelijke dader van het strafbare feit zou zijn geweest. Deze deelnemers worden dan ook daders genoemd. De twee vormen van medeplichtigheid die in artikel 48 Sr worden genoemd worden kennen lagere strafmaxima dan het hoofddelict.").

VKing (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?[edit]

If you google for "R v Whitehouse (1995) 1 Cr. App. R. 420", or even "R v Whitehouse (1995)", the only result is the Wikipedia incitement article....

Law sources are not always searchable in the same way that, Britney's outfit on Tuesday night is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.248.161.11 (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The case reported at [1995] 1 Cr App R 420 is R v Pickford, which is also mentioned in the article. It is probably a mistake. It is probably meant to refer to R v Whitehouse [1977] QB 868. James500 (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Botanical article?[edit]

Not sure why James wants to link to a botanical article when the cannabis being cultivated is clearly as a drug. Seems to em that linking to the drug is strictly non-controversial here whereas linking to a botany article is completely irrelevant♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of crimes in the U.S.[edit]

Came here looking to see what types of incitement are illegal in the U.S.; anything other than incitement to riot? -- Beland (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protect this page?[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

because of current events (actually Wed, Jan 6, 2021). Thank you for considering and discussing. Lexein (talk) 09:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JsfasdF252 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]