Talk:Inclusionary zoning

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inclusionary zoning article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Urban studies and planning Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jiangzhenzhen012, Kwok Ting Yan, Cannyccl. Peer reviewers: Kwok Ting Yan, Cannyccl.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient sources supporting the arguments stating in the historical backgroundKwok Ting Yan (talk) 05:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[edit]

In the part of historical background, it is stated that the existence of inner city ghettos is highly related to exclusionary zoning since the lower income group could not afford to move and live to the suburbs. However, there is no sources supporting this argument. It is in doubt that if the existence of inner city ghettos is caused by other factors more. Also, there is no source supporting the argument that the middle class could act as a role model for the lower class living in the inclusive zoning area

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Inclusionary zoning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

link farm from article space parked[edit]

The following are link farm that was dumped in the article. Removed them per WP:EL. parking them here for reference to editors. Graywalls (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grounded Solutions Network
Innovative Housing Institute
Time for a Left-Right Consensus on Zoning Reform, Theo Mackey Pollack.
The Inclusionary Housing Debate: The Effectiveness of Mandatory Programs Over Voluntary Programs, American Planning Association
Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work? Evidence from California, Benjamin Powell, Ph.D. and Edward Stringham, Ph.D., Reason Foundation Policy Study 318.
California Inclusionary Housing Reader, Institute for Local Government
Resources from the Nonprofit Housing Association of Northern California
End, Don't Mend, County's Inclusionary Housing Program, Reason Foundation
Scrapping the Zoning Code to Solve LA’s Housing Crisis, Reason Foundation
Critique of the Reason Foundation Report and other articles, Victoria Basolo, Department of Planning, Policy & Design, University of California, Irvine
Los Angeles business community's 2004 alternative to mandatory Inclusionary Zoning proposal, Central City Association of Los Angeles
Study Finds Inclusionary Zoning Feasible for Los Angeles, Livable Places
Inclusionary Housing in California: 30 Years of Innovation California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, 2003.
Inclusionary Zoning: The California Experience National Housing Conference, 2004.
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California and the Home Builders Association of Northern California On Common Ground: Joint Principles on Inclusionary Housing, July 2005.