Talk:Increment borer

Forestry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Untitled[edit]

Sentence about CODIT model support for an increment borer spreading infection from infected to noninfected compartments seems unclear. The CODIT work was a retrospective study of past injuries based on dissecting previously infected trees, but it didn't purposely cause injuries (like an increment borer would) to see how they affected tree health or survival. If there is specific research that shows increment boring causes infection, injury, or death of trees, it should be easy to find.pradtke (talk) 04:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In other languages[edit]

http://fmog.dictyon.net/word.php?id=3347 Xakepxakep (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]