Talk:Indians in Japan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rearrangement[edit]

We have an Indian communy in Japan where we communicate and share information through a website

www.Japan-Indians.com

The following feature are provided on the website :

1.Search for Indians in Japan based on location

2. Blogging and forums for discussion

3.Find resale products for a very low cost.

4.Find Indians stores or services provided by Indians in Japan

5.Events and Invitation

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.76.168.102 (talk) 09:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] 



I am suggesting the re-arrangement of religion names. Current arrangement seems to be in correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdheeru (talkcontribs) 06:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source lists the religions of Indians in Japan in this exact order. I see no particular reason to rearrange them. (I do however see lots of recent POV-pushing vandalism aimed at removing the "Islam" and "Christianity" entries from various NRI articles.) cab (talk) 06:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical order does not make any sense. Kindly see other articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdheeru (talkcontribs) 15:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most other NRI articles lack any sources at all for their lists of religions. Instead they make the assumption that religions for migrants occur in exactly the same proportions as in India itself. This is original research, and in fact demonstrably false for other migrant groups (e.g. Korean New Zealanders have a very different religious profile than the South Korean population at large). cab (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source provided, merely lists the religions in alphabetical order and not according to the number of adherents. It will be prudent to change the order and follow other NRI articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdheeru (talkcontribs) 03:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are simply repeating yourself again and again without providing any actual evidence about the religions of Indians in Japan. It is not prudent to violate Wikipedia policies about verifiability and original research simply to push your desired point-of-view. That earns a block --- for example, in the case of the IP address 188.51.60.155 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), with whom you may be familiar ... cab (talk) 09:19, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since we do not have any reliable source for the religious population of Indians in Japan, in the list of religions we should clearly mention as 'as per alphabetical order' to clear the ambiguity. And also the source mentioned in the page is a dead link. Pdheeru (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source Azuma 2008 is not a "link" at all. It's a BOOK. All of the other source links are working fine. And a dead link is not any excuse to remove information you don't like from an article, either. I added the information you suggest. cab (talk) 09:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indians in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Indians in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]