Talk:Indirect infringement in Canadian copyright law

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title[edit]

This page needs a simpler and less confusing and less wordsalady title than "Copyright infringement: to “authorize”, secondary infringement in copyright law in Canada". Bearcat (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:19, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement: to “authorize”, secondary infringement in copyright law in Canada → Copyright infringement: to “authorize,” secondary infringement in copyright law in Canada – Proper comma placement. 5hin3 (talk) 02:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's not helping. As mentioned above, this needs a simpler title - something more like Secondary infringement in Canadian copyright law. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 09:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The IP's suggestions seems to be a good one. The problems with the proposed title are a) it's too long, b) we don't use curly quotation marks and c) per WP:LQ the comma should be outside the quote marks. Jenks24 (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Suggest Indirect infringement in Canadian copyright law, per the first sentence of the article which makes it clear that secondary infringement is only one of two types covered here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support alternative move to Indirect infringement in Canadian copyright law. (Another one to fix: Copyright infringement; substantial part in copyright law in Canada) --Pnm (talk) 21:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]