Talk:Indrani/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 20:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Starts GA Review Page. Hopefully we will start the review shortly. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 20:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Observations[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Reference 1 (Kapoor) goes nowhere. Remove it.
- Reference 2 (page 17) goes to an archive error. Corrected link goes to https://web.archive.org/web/20210307214557/https://archive.org/details/hindugoddessesvi0000kins (which loops)
- I am surprised Monier-Williams gives shach as a term for speech; Vac might have been relevant or better.
- The link for Reference 26 is to the title of the book and not the comparison to other women, such as Rohini, Arundhati, Sita, and Draupadi... (set a reference to page 29 in this book. )
Resolved
- Reference 32 and 34 go to Internet Archive error. See comment on Reference 2. Links to pp. 17–18, 156–158 are defective.
- Yes, I was referring to the Kinsley references. I see you have changed that to Google Books. We'll take that as sorted.
Resolved
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral point of view is presented.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Page created 29 November 2006
- Page has 634 edits by 100 editors
- Link equal to linktext = Satapatha Brahmana A piped link has identical text before and after the pipe (this needs repair)
- 90 day page views = 2,219 with a daily average of 24 views
- Page history does not indicate any edit-warring, page is considered stable;
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Indrani, AK-RAK-1995-6.jpg = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Caption is appropriate.
- File:6th century Indra and Indrani on elephant, Badami Hindu cave temple Karnataka.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. I don't know that Airavata is relevant as the description does not state "Airavata".
Resolved
- File:Victory of Meghanada by RRV.jpg = in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer. Caption needs to have (Indrani) in brackets after Shachi devi's first reference in the caption.
- File:Krishna Uproots the Parijata Tree, Folio from a Bhagavata Purana (Ancient Stories of the Lord) LACMA M.72.1.26.jpg = released by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art www.lacma.org with its "Public Domain High Resolution Image Available" mark. (Indrani) needed in caption.
- File:13th century Saptamatrikas Panagal Group of Temples ruins, Sakti tradition.jpg = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Drop vahana and just leave it at elephant below her.
::::: Done.245CMR.•👥📜 06:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- File:12th-century Vedic Indra and Indrani at Shaivism Hindu temple Hoysaleswara arts Halebidu Karnataka India (crop).jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Captioning is appropriate.
- File:The Hindu Godess Indrani (a); The Hindu Goddess Brahmani (b) LACMA M.91.232.11a-b (2 of 2).jpg = released by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art www.lacma.org with its "Public Domain High Resolution Image Available" mark. Caption is appropriate
- File:Indradeva.jpg = in the public domain in the United States. This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1926, (accepted, Jaina artwork) Caption is appropriate.
- Overall:
- Lot of work has gone into bringing this article up to date. Article is 15 years old.
- Some minor clean-up of references is needed
- Attention to captions on images
- One bug needs correction
- Upon completion, the article should go to GA status. Good work bringing it to this state. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)