Talk:Industrial archaeology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

What's that word list supposed to be? Actually, aqueducts have been around far longer than back to the Industrial Revolution. --Abdull 14:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think that should be taken out completely, since it appears to be just an unconnected list of stuff related to industries. The "Exclusions" section makes no sense, also. Could we get some clarification? --Nucleusboy 22:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be in favour of it being moved to a side page perhaps, as it seems to dominate the article. A few items that are often studied are probably worth mentioning though... ++Lar 02:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's a list of things that are often studied? I don't see why we need to have a list of all of the possible things that an Industrial Archaeologist might study; does this mean that Electronics should have links to every article remotely related to electronics, like Electron or Copper? --Nucleusboy 02:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Er, I was agreeing with you! Sorry if that wasn't clear. I think leaving a vastly shortened list in the article to give an idea of what it's about (if the 4 points at the very top were judged not sufficient), and then moving the rest of the list to List of industrial archaeology topics article is the way to go. That say I would think that, actually, Electron and copper do belong in the electronics article, can't have electronics without electrons, and copper is hugely important,, but Field doped CMOS substrate and Molex connector and Multi chip module and picoFarad (made some of those up, they may not all be articles) probably do not... if anything they belong in a list of terms, if at all. Helps? Perhaps either you or I should go ahead and be bold and carve the list out to a separate article? ++Lar 03:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a good idea... can you think of a good title? --Nucleusboy 20:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
List of industrial archaeology topics was the best I could come up with... if you can think of a better one, please use it instead! ++Lar 20:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go with that one. --Nucleusboy 21:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be internationalised to reflect the fact that Industrial Archaeology is not solely English in focus.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Industrial archaeology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Industrial archaeology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]