Talk:Industrial waste

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Danielnunez 9386.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 September 2021 and 3 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Blue.Slip16. Peer reviewers: Mflloyd, Syared.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nataliergonz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete and redirect to hazardous waste[edit]

  • delete - distinction between industrial and chemical waste is splitting hairs and confusing for users. Users are very surprised to find almost no info in Wikipedia on this crucial topic; both should redirect to hazardous waste --Espoo 11:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree completely industrial waste is any waste originating from industry. It does not mean that this waste is hazardous. Mines waste large amounts of rocks, please dont tell me you consider rocks to be hazardous! --Alex 12:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Alex. Industrial waste can include agricultural fiber and such things as nut shells, which in no way are hazardous! The problem with little information being available on topics that are potentially damaging to industry is a political one. Thpn 03:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Industrial waste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation ENVS 10H[edit]

Maybe you could add some pictures in the page to emphasize your points further. I found this page to be very interesting. Perhaps you could and define each term that you put in there so the reader can understand it better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielnunez 9386 (talkcontribs) 20:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chemistry[edit]

Industrial effluent of water pollution 2405:201:A40F:17:691E:1133:D5FA:5758 (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]