Talk:Industrias Pampero

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Venezuela Mid‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Custom article message box[edit]

Hi Rangoon11. You removed my custom {{ambox}}, which read: "In the past, this article has repeatedly attracted biased edits. Please watchlist the article. If any user adds puffery, please remove it and find and contact the user." But you didn't state why you don't like it. Why don't you like it? Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 23:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's non-standard, ugly and unnecessary. The (perfectly valid) issues which you had with the article have now been fixed and we are now watching the article and will prevent promotional content being re added. I don't disagree with your goal merely your means. Rangoon11 (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's non-standard. And I don't claim that it's elegant. But is two watchers truly enough? Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]