Talk:Industrigruppen JAS

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources[edit]

Even when translating articles from other Wikipedias, reliable sources must be directly cited in this article. - BilCat (talk) 03:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are reliable, and are given so what is the problem? BP OMowe (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sentences in the article need to have inline citations for which source was used for which claims. This is especially.necessary as the sources aren't in English, and as other editors may add more information later. - BilCat (talk) 22:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I have to point out that this article is NOT a translation from the Swedish WP but written from scratch with the sources given. Other than that, your clarification makes perfect sense. BP OMowe (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't assuming that it was a translation, just including the possibility that it might have been, as I've encountered that before with other editors and other articles. Thanks for adding the inline citations, and it looks good at first glance. Thanks for attending to the issue. - BilCat (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

revision[edit]

When I discovered the article, I failed to uncover reliable sources. Thanks for the new revision. I encourage to stimulate the discussion on the deletion log, so as to keep the article.

Verbal.noun (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]