Talk:Ino budgerigar mutation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lacewing budgerigar variety[edit]

A search for "Lacewing" in wikipedia takes you straight to the page describing the Lacewing insect. What is the best way of directing people looking for the Lacewing budgerigar variety to the Ino budgerigar mutation page? We could either set up a disambiguation page for Lacewing (how is this done?) or create a Budgerigar varieties page listing the varieties with links to the underlying mutations. Virtually all other variety names have the same problem - the Lacewing is just an example. I prefer the Budgerigar varieties page. Comments? Trevor37 (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, doing both would be the best solution. Trevor37 (talk) 09:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why not create a redirect from Budgerigar varieties (or whatever) to Budgerigar colour genetics and include the info there? A separate list (List of Budgerigar varieties?) is a possibility, though it might mean unnecessarily duplicating some of the information from the genetics article. I've gone ahead and redirected Lacewing budgerigar mutation and Lacewing budgerigar to this article (redirects are cheap - if it's something that you can imagine someone legitimately typing into the search box, then create one). If you're planning on creating a specific lacewing section here, the target of the redirect can be tweaked to automatically jump to it... --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 00:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
EDIT: Considering the hatnotes already present at Neuroptera, Lacewing (disambiguation) should probably exist. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages) for how to go about that (I need to read up on it myself!) --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 01:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for setting up the disambiguation page. Looks good. I think I will go ahead with a Budgerigar varieties page. What I have in mind is an alphabetical list, with a very brief introduction with variety-specific information and links to the underlying mutation pages. So Lacewing, for example, would link to both Ino and Cinnamon as equal underlying mutations, but make it clear that most of the information would be found under Ino. Similarly for Dark-eyed Clears, Rainbows, etc. Names of all varieties could be listed, including obsolete ones like Jade, or regional ones like Austral, Silver, etc. I'll watch out for any duplication and try to eliminate it. Trevor37 (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, man. If you think it needs it and you can do it, go right ahead and don't let anyone stop you. ;) --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ino budgerigar mutation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]