Talk:Inside Man/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 18:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spike's tweet this morning that this was his #1 box office success makes me want to take a closer look at this. I will review it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 18:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The external links tool to the right says one external link has gone bad.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 23:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article is not WP:V in certain places. The production notes are a 32 page document. You have to name it as a reference and then in each place that you cite it, you have to use a page number. Although the document does not have printed page numbers, in Reader, you can identify the page number.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:LEAD
  • The last phrase of the first paragraph ("Christopher Plummer, Willem Dafoe and Chiwetel Ejiofor also feature.") is ungrammatical. "also feature" should be "are also featured".--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 23:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would change "a positive critical response" to "a generally positive critical response" to clarify that rather than one positive response it was the general summary of responses.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 23:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have read your comments, and made significant edits to the article, as requested.--SuperSonic2000 (talk) 01:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Principal photography
  • I have made significant edits to the article, as per your recommendations. I have listed the page numbers to the production notes, edited the external links, using the external links tool, and made the requests edits in Principal Photography. --SuperSonic2000 (talk) 06:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Design
Music
Box office
Images
GA Review

Thank you, TonyTheTiger, for taking the time to review this article. I have made some changes to the article to the best of my ability. -- SuperSonic2000 (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Design

I made edits to several sentences in the article, in relation to using a person's full name, before simply their last name. --SuperSonic2000 (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Music

In researching information for this article, I could not find any information on soundtrack sales.-- SuperSonic2000 (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

A research error on my part. Removed the sentence in its entirety.-- SuperSonic2000 (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • No readd and say that it was at the time number one but subsequently passed by Training Day.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 13:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have re-read the article. In regards to the film's opening weekend gross, I have re-created the sentence: "Inside Man held the record for the highest opening weekend gross as a Denzel Washington starring vehicle, surpassing Man on Fire (2004) which debuted with $22.7 million on its first weekend." It should be noted that this record was ultimately surpassed by American Gangster (2007) was opened with more than $43 million on opening weekend.--SuperSonic2000 (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Images
    • Thank you very much for the pass, TonyTheTiger, and to everyone else who helped me in editing this article! So happy to have finally gotten Inside Man at GA status!--SuperSonic2000 (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]