Talk:Intel ADX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel ADX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (your reason here) --Emperor-Overlord100 (talk) 19:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Not much in known about this instruction set extension but its existence was revealed in HWinfo. So J think it should stay so it be easy to add information to it when details will be revealed.[reply]

Not notable. No. Fiddle Faddle 19:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor-Overlord100 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC) And article already has some content.--Emperor-Overlord100 (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information re: arbitrary precision arithmatic[edit]

According to the second article in the reference section, the ADX instruction set only allows large integer arithmetic, not arbitrary precision arithmetic. The former is a very small subset of the latter. Specifically, it doesn't allow arbitrarily large integer arithmetic, nor large floating point arithmetic. The wording should be corrected.Talcite (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to do it yourself, preferably together with providing references. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 21:49, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expand[edit]

Two of us have stubbed it independently, with one editor removing the stub twice and rating B. Well, if this is so short a topic that B is anywhere near the mark (which two of us believe it is more like a stub), then we may as well merge into a list of instructions (which I'm sure we shouldn't). A link to the former instruction would be good, and I'm sure there's other things... Regards Widefox; talk 21:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reading the carry from the overflow flag???[edit]

"Adds two unsigned integers plus carry, reading the carry from the overflow flag" Daroooo (talk) 10:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]