Talk:Intel Quartus Prime

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel Quartus Prime article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed merge from SOPC Builder[edit]

I don't believe there is any point for each individual program distributed with Quartus II to receive its own page; shouldn't they all be described here, anyway? If there's a substantial amount of information about any it should obviously have a page just so we don't have that much information, but the SOPC Builder page is quite short and could just as easily be included here. Any comments? JulesH (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer them to be separate just for visibility on 'term'. For example; when looking for information on MS-Word it may be better as far as visibility and scope to have MS-Word separate from MS-Office which would be separate from MS-Windows. However; I totally agree/suggest that the SOPC Builder and Quartus pages should have links to each other and well stated that SOPC Builder is distributed with Altera Quartus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.137.176 (talk) 07:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged SOPC Builder into this since SOPC Builder fails WP:N and does not deserve a separate article. Personal preferences are irrelevant. -- Wonderfl ^(reply) 14:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quartus Prime[edit]

Quartus II seems to be depreciated. shouldnt this article reflect that quartus II is depreciated an link to another on quartus prime..... or cover quartus I, quartus II, and quartus prime in different subsections including their differences.

here's the link to Quartus Prime: https://www.altera.com/products/design-software/fpga-design/quartus-prime/support.html

also the link to quartus II in the article is no longer valid and needs updated, but wasn't sure if I should simply change it to the quartus prime page.

24.156.80.24 (talk) 03:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC) ejf[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Altera Quartus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820054140/http://www.altera.com/products/software/products/quartus2 to http://www.altera.com/products/software/products/quartus2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Text sentence structure mangled[edit]

There are quite a few incomplete sentences here and mangled text, missing words like "the" and "that" and "a" which makes the text read like it was extracted from a Power Point presentation with bullet points, it does not flow with proper English. Anyone else notice that? Is it worth my fixing? Damotclese (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]