Talk:Internal security

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Intelligence Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force

Editing This Page[edit]

If anyone is reading this, PLEASE know what you're doing if you wish to edit this page. Someone apparantly attempted to add more to this page and it was a mess, no punctuation marks, mispellings left and right, and thing that did not make sense. (ie: "us is having problems". Just check for a wikipedia help section if you are not sure how to use the editing option and be sure to know areliable scource for whatever you want to add. :) QZX,

Pictures[edit]

If anyone is here and they know how to put in photographs, i would apreciate some pictures of riots.

Catagorisation[edit]

I've put this in government, if you don't feel this is apropriate feel free to move it LordFenix 21:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this original research?[edit]

As it is, this article is completely unreferenced. Of course, there are numerous "Internal security" acts, such as McCarran Internal Security Act, Malaysia's Internal Security Act [1], Thailand's Internal Security Bill [2], and possibly others. Are we talking about such acts in this article? Please make it clear and sourced. Otherwise, this aricle may qualify for deletion.Biophys 21:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that we have already List of intelligence agencies, List of law enforcement agencies, List of protective services, and List of secret police organizations. So, the list provided here is hardly meaningful.Biophys 21:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a mere definition of the term "Internal Security", it does not qualify for deletion. Havinga small list of examples of IS orgs is not meaningless, not everyone reading this article may have read those lists. QZXA2 22:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noam Chomsky quote unnecessary/non-neutral?[edit]

The quote seems a little out of place, if we're generically defining IS, then such a view is a distraction. I'm sure someone can put up a whole article on the use (or misuse) of internal security bureaus throughout history, but here it's just disjointed. Kw0134 (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]